Front shock protector tube difference

Post your E12 technical questions and comments here. Please, no off-topic posts.

Moderators: Mike W., Pierre

Post Reply
T.Hanson
Posts: 1696
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:39 am

Front shock protector tube difference

Post by T.Hanson »

The stock parts drawing features a foam cylinder that slides over the piston shaft with a small black vinyl Shiner's fez cap cover for that.

The Bilstein shock in the front strut (just apart) uses a much longer bellows type sleeve with a tight fitting collar end on top, loose fit around the shock tube, no tie wrap (?).

Are both systems just different solutions for keeping the shaft clean ? I.e, the Bilstein bellows tube, loose fit around the shock isn't missing the foam insert, no big deal, good as the stock things.
User avatar
Mike W.
Posts: 2889
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:12 am
Location: Sonoma County

Post by Mike W. »

The foam is the aux spring, the overload. A bit crude, but it works. Bilsteins have internal bump stops and don't require it. The rubber boot that comes with them fits tight IIRC, it is snug up top and goes over the gland nut at the bottom.
Mike W.



02 525ita. Wife's, aka grocery getter
02 530i. New to the fleet, 3 pedals.
03 QX4, AKA the Datsun. Finally got the 4WD vacationmoble to stop smoking.
07 Xterra. Still on the DL, a purchase from hell.
User avatar
wkohler
Posts: 1063
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Post by wkohler »

The other thing to remember is that Bilsteins are actually upside-down shock absorbers, which is why the "piston" is so large. The piston would be the shock body on a conventional twin-tube damper.
Post Reply